E-mail address: leen. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more. If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in. If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube. Log out of Readcube. Click on an option below to access. Log out of ReadCube. Following Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, we found a prominent role of the biological mother and other primary biological family members in the upbringing of our participants.
Spiritual and material support were perceived to be the most important type of support, respectively, while the adolescents were growing up and in their current lives.
These findings provide support for the perception that caregiving systems are adaptable to particular sociocultural contexts. Further, the importance of particular functions of social support could signify a potentially selective buffering effect of these functions in adverse contexts.
Because of the importance of the primary biological family and the salient role of parent—child relationships in the face of adversity, future research needs to focus on this particular kind of social relationship in contexts of prolonged collective violence. Volume 52 , Issue 4. The full text of this article hosted at iucr. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account.
If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username. Regular Empirical Article. Search for more papers by this author. The authors would like to express their gratitude to all adolescents for participating in this research and Susan Ayot for providing support during the interviews.
